tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328789579487679553.post8390091652683107079..comments2023-09-09T04:41:25.659-05:00Comments on Tundra Vision: The Dan Snyder FallacyC.D. Angelihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01446881989644895333noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328789579487679553.post-60072857293444673072009-03-15T13:33:00.000-05:002009-03-15T13:33:00.000-05:00Tell you what, Tempest...that 13-3 season added a ...Tell you what, Tempest...that 13-3 season added a lot of credibility (and time) to TT and MM. One article I've been bopping around lately is if 2007 is the aberration or not. What if 2008 is the aberration? See what I mean? I think 2009 is going to go a long way in deciding that.<BR/><BR/>And I will agree 105% that Dom Capers brings this change instant credibility, too. But, the scheme still smacks a bit as a move of desperation, and worse, smacks as a move very, very similar to the ZBS change. The ZBS was a move made to copy what others were having success with, whether we had the talent for it or not. And, I think it is clear that our offensive line has been, at best, average since moving to that scheme.<BR/><BR/>Now that the two holdover tackles from the Sherman regime appear to be on their way out, that scheme is going to be even more under-the-microscope in 2009.<BR/><BR/>So, the 3-4, despite the great talent you cite (and I agree with), is still going to be utilizing players out of position (Kampman, Pickett, Hawk, Poppinga) until the "right fit" talent comes along. I think it has more room for struggles early on, and the benefits (if any) will be seen 3-4 years from now.C.D. Angelihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01446881989644895333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328789579487679553.post-41065458739265911132009-03-13T10:13:00.000-05:002009-03-13T10:13:00.000-05:00Hi C.D.,Thanks for your comment. And sorry about ...Hi C.D.,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for your comment. And sorry about all the name differences in my posts. I was not sure what to put. But I will be the same from now on.<BR/><BR/>I think your comment, "I predicted years ago that Thompson's approach would result not in great success or great failure, but extended mediocrity" may be true. However, they did go 13-3, which was the best record since the Super Bowl years. Perhaps it was an aberration. This year will certainly tell a lot.<BR/><BR/>But another claim, "I think you are looking at an experiment that can go, at best, okay, and at worst, horribly wrong" I don't agree with. There is a non-zero probability that the new defense will succeed greatly or even moderately. It could also tank. Actually, I think a DC makes a HUGE difference, as evidenced in the Bates year. Clearly Sanders was in over his head. We have clearly four pro-bowlers on defense and arguably five (Barnett when healthy). We should have a legitimate defense, which severely underachieved last year. I could be wrong, but the assumption that it will certainly be worse and probably much, much worse is not necessarily valid. But again, we will see come September.tempest4543https://www.blogger.com/profile/17426133048347455677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328789579487679553.post-45379105847097875472009-03-11T23:22:00.000-05:002009-03-11T23:22:00.000-05:00The good thing about Dom Capers is that he has so ...The good thing about Dom Capers is that he has so much credibility that he has little to lose. If the Packers have a rotten season, he is going to get a DC position elsewhere.<BR/><BR/>And, if you really think about it, if the D improves but the offense falters, Capers may be the man to be promoted to HC in the event MM gets the axe.<BR/><BR/>But, I do think there has to be some consternation right now inside the Don Hutson Center. I think you are looking at an experiment that can go, at best, okay, and at worst, horribly wrong. You can make a case that we may be have to upgrade six or more positions along the defensive side of the ball in the next year or so.C.D. Angelihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01446881989644895333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328789579487679553.post-62914080027683288642009-03-09T22:46:00.000-05:002009-03-09T22:46:00.000-05:00C.D.Thanks again for the clarification. A couple ...C.D.<BR/><BR/>Thanks again for the clarification. A couple of final thoughts. I wonder how the new defensive staff views the players on the roster. Surely they must be aware of the apparent lack of talent on the defensive side of the ball. Why would they sign up for the job if they felt they would fail? <BR/><BR/>Also, McCarthy and Thompson must know they are on thin ice. Do they all really think there is sufficient talent on the current roster? It doesn't make sense.<BR/><BR/>Thanks again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328789579487679553.post-76039823665308607092009-03-09T18:55:00.000-05:002009-03-09T18:55:00.000-05:00Well, thanks Tempest. Appreciate the good vibes.I...Well, thanks Tempest. Appreciate the good vibes.<BR/><BR/>I don't think I try to make things "depressing". In fact, I think the Packers are walking a thin line between success and failure, and I don't think it really takes too much to push the team over that line either way.<BR/><BR/>There's a lot to respect about Thompson. He's really cleaned up the cap, he really improved the climate of the team as it relates to holdouts and contract disputes, and he is committed to his plan, come what may.<BR/><BR/>But, the danger comes in believing so hard in your plan that you avoid the actions that really might be in the team's best interest. I predicted years ago that Thompson's approach would result not in great success or great failure, but extended mediocrity. Time will tell.<BR/><BR/>Go Pack!C.D. Angelihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01446881989644895333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328789579487679553.post-78461626373114384352009-03-09T16:51:00.000-05:002009-03-09T16:51:00.000-05:00C.D.Thank you for the comment. I have no particul...C.D.<BR/><BR/>Thank you for the comment. I have no particular fondness for TT. I have a great fondness for the Green Bay Packers. <BR/><BR/>If Thompson is not doing the job, he should be fired. If he does not have success this year, he definitely must be looked at. <BR/><BR/>However, I do not agree with the general tone of many Packer fans who appear to have a personal hatred toward him. <BR/><BR/>I also get very depressed when I read your comments, because they make the situation often look hopeless. Maybe that is not your intention. But it is what is represented. Please don't mistake that for TT love. It is not. It is hope that the Packers indeed can turn this around. Otherwise, they need a new regime.<BR/><BR/>Thank you again.tempest4543https://www.blogger.com/profile/17426133048347455677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328789579487679553.post-21475541087193018392009-03-09T11:52:00.000-05:002009-03-09T11:52:00.000-05:00Well, Chicago, that is always your choice. I thin...Well, Chicago, that is always your choice. I think if you look through my posts, you will find enough positives about TT in there. But, I don't even think this one was "negative" towards TT. Negative towards a columnist who refers to people who criticize Thompson as braying mules? You bet. Negative towards a columnist that uses Dan Snyder as the only measuring stick? You bet.<BR/><BR/>I have never called for Thompson to be fired. Ever. But I have no problem looking at the situation and giving a critical analysis. Defense is a problem? Check. Trying to switch to a 3-4 without the right talent? Check. Signing only backups and reserves from the FA pool again? Check.<BR/><BR/>Fair reviewer? Well, that's for you to judge. The question I might ask is if you are a fair and unbiased reader, or are you sensitive to anyone offering criticism to guys that you like?C.D. Angelihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01446881989644895333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5328789579487679553.post-58685844220456975942009-03-09T10:41:00.000-05:002009-03-09T10:41:00.000-05:00Dear C.D.,I don't quite understand the unrelenting...Dear C.D.,<BR/><BR/>I don't quite understand the unrelenting TT disdain. I have rarely heard any positive comments from you. It appears you are the antithesis of Vandermause. I cannot read this blog or packerchatters anymore because of the continual negativity. I wish there were fair reviewers, not such polarized ones. Maybe someday.<BR/><BR/>Packer fan in ChicagoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com